View Full Version : Kumho MX vs Falken Azenis 615
DelSolBurrow
06-26-2007, 01:57 PM
I was wondering if anyone here has had the chance to have a set of each of these tires on thier vehicle or if anyone has any input on if one would be better than the other? The Kumho's seem to be about 20.00 less each than the falken's and for my use noise level or tread life isn't much of a factor since these will not be daily driven tires.
focus_wrc
06-26-2007, 02:10 PM
Oh I hate the MX. I had them in 205/50/15 and the side walls were so soft. Every time I autox on them I was mad that why i didn't get the falkens. After they delaminated I went with Falken. I did one Autox on them and I love them.
PM me regarding the Falkens I know a place you can get them cheap.
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y287/dj_r/IMG_0009.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y287/dj_r/IMG_0008.jpg
DelSolBurrow
06-26-2007, 02:28 PM
oh well i already have a set of the Falken but i was just looking ahead to when i burn these up but I am a Falken fan since i have really enjoyed every set i have owned, but just thought i would gather some info on other brands.
woodrufj
06-26-2007, 08:57 PM
I've ran the MXes on my truck a lot without those problems. STS national titles have been won on Mxes as well.
Typically Azenis work better on small cars, MX on bigger cars. Del Sol is definitly a small car.
Jay W
505/287 Dakota
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.